| 
   
Twin Wing Landyacht Concept  
 
 
Goal - 100 kt/200 kph/120 mph with course racing landyacht  
- Current World Record is 94 mph with one-way asymmetrical yacht 
  
 
Problem - Landyacht speeds are limited by three factors:  
- stability - rolling (heeling) moment limits available aerodynamic force 
 
- skidding - tire traction limits available aerodynamic force 
 
- efficiency - drag limits apparent wind angle (beta) which caps 
  
 
Empirical Data -Limited  
- Annual NALSA speed trials - historical yacht speeds & yacht speed/wind speed ratio 
 
- SDSU wind tunnel test - rear wheels alone account for 30% to 40% of total aerodynamic drag 
  
 
Design Approach - Twin Wing Concept  
- Inclined wing, displaced from centerline, reduces effective moment arm 
 
- Aerodynamic downforce adds to traction w/o adding inertia 
 
- Structural load paths eliminate large bending moments in axle, body - lighter weight 
 
- Delta wheel fairings 
 
- Concept sketches: 
 
rear quarter  
front quarter  
top  
right side  
front  
rear  
 
Twin Wing Rationale 
- Consider a single wing, set to windward & inclined to leeward 
 
- Projection of lift vector passes close to leeward wheel (Fig. 1) 
 
- Force vector could pass through contact patch, producing zero moment 
 
- Produces downward component 
 
- Reflecting wing for other tack produces two, mutual supporting wings in an A-frame 
 
- Pilot controls each wing separately to control rolling moments 
 
- Initial feasibility looks promising, but light wind performance is a problem.
  
 
Delta Wheel Fairings  
- Best landyachts today use simple flat plate over wheel hub - minimum "frontal" area 
 
- Must work at + 15 - 30 degrees beta; zero beta drag is relatively unimportant 
 
- Traditional fairings increase "frontal " area, do not consider separation due to beta 
 
- Fat delta provides streamlined shapes in streamwise cutting planes 
  
 
Aerodynamic Issues  
- Fairing shaping for fully attached flow 
 
- Wing/fairing & Wing/Wing interference 
 
- Low Reynolds number performance 
 
- Span/chord length tradeoffs (induced drag vs Reynolds number) 
 
- Body shape 
 
- Overall configuration sizing and optimization 
  
 
Aerodynamic Tools:  
- Eppler PROFIL: single element airfoil design 
 
- MCARFA: multiple element airfoil analysis 
 
- CMARC: 3D analysis 
  
 
Tool Deficiencies:  
- Mesh generation - difficult to handle wing/fairing geometry 
 
- Multiple element airfoil design 
 
- Inability to handle laminar separation bubbles or modest trailing edge separation 
  
 
Progress to Date:  
- 2D airfoil design 
 
- Parametric study of 2 wings 
 
- Representative fairings & wing intersections modeled 
  
 
 |